Ovarian Cancer

The exact cause of ovarian cancer is unknown. Ovarian cancer
represents the 9th most common cancer diagnosed in Australian
women, but the 6th most common cause of cancer deaths in this
group1. The symptoms of ovarian cancer are often vague
and non-specific and can be confused with common symptoms of other
disorders. Often, by the time the cancer is diagnosed, the tumour
may have spread beyond the ovaries and into the uterus, bladder,
bowel, and omentum. These cells can begin forming new tumour
growths before cancer is even suspected.
A woman’s risk of developing ovarian cancer increases with age
and close to 80% of new ovarian cancer cases diagnosed are in women
50 years or older, with the median age of first diagnosis being 64
years1. Around 1378 Australian women are
expected to be diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2010 and close to
800 Australian women die from this disease each
year1.
In Australia, 1 in 77 women will be diagnosed with ovarian
cancer before the age of 851. Similarly, in the United
States, the lifetime risk for a woman developing ovarian cancer is
1 in 71, while the lifetime risk of death is 1 in 952.
More than half of the deaths from ovarian cancer occur in women
between 55 and 74 years of age. Approximately one quarter of
ovarian cancer deaths occur in women between 35 and 54 years of
age.

(From: www.medscape.com)
Background and Literature Review
Epithelial ovarian cancer is a major cause of cancer mortality
in women. The cancer is usually asymptomatic in early stage and
thus is often first diagnosed at late stage. Despite advances in
surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy techniques over the last few
decades, epidemiological studies indicate these advances have had a
marginal impact on the course of ovarian cancer. It is universally
agreed that current therapy is inadequate because of the advanced
stage at which most ovarian cancer cases present clinically. The
vast majority of patients present with Stage 3/4 disease and have
an extremely poor prognosis (~15-20% survive 5 years). Those
patients who present with properly staged, well-differentiated
Stage 1 disease have much better rates of survival (>90%). The
development of an effective community-based screening programme for
early detection of ovarian cancer, especially in high-risk women,
is undoubtedly the number one priority for long-term reduction of
the mortality due to ovarian cancer.
While no ovarian cancer test has been developed that is suitable
for community-based screening, evidence supports the hypothesis
that certain epithelial ovarian cancers may be detectable up to two
years prior to their clinical presentation3,4. Should it
become possible to screen for Stage 1 disease with an accuracy of
80% an overall ovarian cancer death reduction of the order of 50%
should be achieved.
Contemporary screening approaches have focused on plasma/serum
biomarkers (including the current gold standard CA125 for
monitoring disease treatment) and imaging techniques. While a
significant proportion of asymptomatic ovarian cancers can be
identified by measurement of plasma CA1255, by real time
ultrasonography6 and by colour-flow Doppler7,
these screening modalities, even when applied in combination, have
an unacceptably low positive predictive value and to date no
effective population-based screening strategy for ovarian cancer
exists. Some further advantages have been suggested by more recent
studies employing annual CA125 screening with transvaginal
ultrasound as a second line test8 although it will still
be several years until definitive data on the effects of this
screen on mortality can be determined.
1. National Breast and
Ovarian Cancer Centre, http://nbocc.org.au
2. Ovarian Cancer National
Alliance, http://www.ovariancancer.org/
3. Jacobs I J; Rivera H;
Oram D H; Bast R C, Differential
diagnosis of ovarian cancer with tumour markers CA 125, CA 15-3 and
TAG 72.3., British journal of obstetrics
and
gynaecology 1993;100(12):1120-4.
4. Jacobs I J; Skates S;
Davies A P; Woolas R P; Jeyerajah A; Weidemann P; Sibley K; Oram D
H, Risk
of diagnosis of ovarian cancer after raised serum CA 125
concentration: a prospective cohort study,.BMJ (Clinical
research ed.) 1996;313(7069):1355-8.
5. Skates S J; Xu F J; Yu Y
H; Sjövall K; Einhorn N; Chang Y; Bast R C; Knapp R C, Toward
an optimal algorithm for ovarian cancer screening with longitudinal
tumor markers. Cancer 1995;76(10
Suppl):2004-10.
6. Karlan B Y; Platt L
D, Ovarian
cancer screening. The role of ultrasound in early detection.
Cancer 1995;76(10 Suppl):2011-5.
7. Bourne T; Campbell S;
Steer C; Whitehead M I; Collins W P, Transvaginal
colour flow imaging: a possible new screening technique for ovarian
cancer. BMJ (Clinical research
ed.) 1989;299(6712):1367-70.
8. Menon et al (2009)
Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening
for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers:
results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of
Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS)
|